Transport Methodology & Data

Transport Methodology and Data: This page documents the data sources, calculation methods, and interpretation rules used across all transport-related research on Odyssey Discoveries. Individual route analyses and interactive tools apply this framework to specific routes and scenarios. It defines the common analytical engine behind all Iberian intercity transport comparisons.

For broader governance, transparency, and methodological documentation, see the Research Desk, which details the assumptions, data sources, and update logic underpinning all analyses.

Scope of Application

This methodology applies to:

  • Iberian intercity transport comparisons

  • Route-level sustainability scoring

  • Interactive transport calculators and comparative tables

It does not include:

  • Live pricing feeds

  • Booking recommendations or operator endorsements

This framework ensures consistent, reproducible, and transparent comparisons across trains, flights, buses, and cars.

Mini Methodology Map: Transport Analysis Workflow

All route analyses follow the same process to maintain consistency:

Define route boundaries → Door-to-door travel time → Mode-specific carbon factors → Cost normalization → Score & compare results

Data Sources

Carbon Emissions

Carbon emissions are calculated using a mode-specific hybrid approach to maximize accuracy:

Trains, Cars, and Flights train-travel-carbon-methodology

  • Calculated using EcoPassenger, developed by the Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung (IFEU)

  • Accounts for:

    • Country-specific electricity mixes

    • Vehicle or aircraft type

    • Average occupancy assumptions

Flight Carbon Methodology flight-carbon-methodology

  • Short-haul vs medium-haul assumptions

  • Radiative forcing considered per EcoPassenger methodology

  • Includes airport access and standard buffers

Buses / Coaches Bus-carbon-methodology

  • Calculated using European Environment Agency (EEA) well-to-wheel emission factors

  • Applied because EcoPassenger does not model long-distance buses

Car Travel Assumptions (Solo vs Shared) car-travel-assumptions

  • Differentiates between single-occupancy and shared travel

  • Occupancy assumptions influence per-passenger carbon estimates

These calculations are applied consistently across all routes. For broader governance, sourcing, and methodological transparency, see the Research Desk.

Cost Data

Costs are modeled using:

  • Historical booking patterns

  • Major Iberian aggregators and operator sites

  • Standard advance-purchase assumptions

Costs reflect:

  • Mandatory seat reservations

  • Typical baggage allowances

  • Realistic fare availability

They do not include:

  • Loyalty discounts

  • Flash sales or operator-specific promotions

For interactive tools, see the Travel Carbon Calculator Hub.

Time Calculations

All travel times are door-to-door, not schedule-only:

  • Access to stations or airports

  • Security and boarding buffers

  • Transfers

  • Arrival into city centers

Flights include standard airport buffers to reflect real-world conditions.

Related anchor: Door-to-door travel time assumptions

Sustainability Score Framework

Each transport option is scored across three dimensions:

  • Cost

  • CO₂ emissions

  • Door-to-door travel time

Normalization

  • Each dimension is scaled 0–10 per route:

    • 10 = best performer

    • 0 = worst performer

This allows apples-to-apples comparisons across euros, kilograms, and hours.

Weighting

  • Users or default profiles assign weights to cost, carbon, and time.

  • Total score = (Cost × weight) + (CO₂ × weight) + (Time × weight)

  • No weighting is “correct”; the framework makes trade-offs explicit.

Interpretation Rules

  • Scores are relative within a route, not across routes

  • Higher scores indicate a better fit to stated priorities

  • Low scores do not imply unsuitability for all travelers

Limitations

This methodology does not account for:

  • Non-CO₂ aviation effects beyond standard multipliers

  • Congestion externalities

  • Infrastructure lifecycle emissions

  • Real-time disruptions or service quality

Results represent modeled snapshots, not guarantees.

Final Note

Transport Methodology and Data: This methodology exists to reduce guesswork, not replace judgment.
It provides a consistent framework to compare transport options while keeping value-based decisions explicit.

For broader governance, transparency, and methodological reference, see the Research Desk, which documents all assumptions, data sources, and update logic for Odyssey Discoveries research.

External Sources & References

This methodology is grounded in authoritative, publicly available datasets and institutional references to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reproducibility of all transport analyses.

  1. EcoPassenger – IFEU

EcoPassenger, developed by the Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung (IFEU), provides detailed passenger transport emission factors for trains, cars, and flights across Europe, accounting for vehicle type, electricity mixes, and average occupancy.

  1. European Environment Agency (EEA) – Well-to-Wheel Emission Factors

The EEA provides well-to-wheel emission factors for buses and coaches in Europe, allowing accurate per-passenger carbon calculations where other models do not cover long-distance bus travel.

  1. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE – Spain) – Transport Statistics

Spain’s official statistical office provides passenger and freight transport data by mode and distance, supporting route-level transport analyses and sustainability scoring.

  1. Statistics Portugal (INE Portugal) – Transport and Communications

Portugal’s national statistics office offers official datasets on passenger mobility, modal splits, and transport trends, forming the basis of Portuguese route-level comparisons.

  1. Green Key Sustainable Tourism Certification

Green Key is an internationally recognized eco-label documenting certified sustainable cities and properties, referenced to support city-level sustainability datasets used in transport scoring.

🚆 ✈️ Travel Decision Tool

Answer a few questions to find your best travel option

1 Is there a direct train under 2.5 hours?

2 Do I need to work or want to relax?

3 Am I going to islands or northern Spain?

4 Booking last minute on a budget?

5 Carrying lots of luggage?

🚆 RECOMMENDATION: Take the TRAIN

Based on your answers, the train is your best option!

Why train wins:
  • Flights are often banned for short distances
  • Better for work or relaxation
  • Train stations are easier with luggage

✈️ RECOMMENDATION: FLY without second-guessing

Based on your destination, flying is the clear choice!

Why flying wins:
  • Islands and northern Spain are better reached by air
  • Often faster for remote destinations

🔍 RECOMMENDATION: Check BOTH options

For last-minute budget bookings, compare train and flight prices.

What to do:
  • Check budget airlines for last-minute sales
  • Compare with train ticket prices
  • Sometimes flight sales beat last-minute train prices

🤔 RECOMMENDATION: Consider both options

Compare train and flight options based on these factors:

Factors to consider:
  • Environmental impact (train is greener)
  • Total door-to-door travel time
  • Current prices for both options
  • Personal preference for comfort

📋 Quick Decision Guide

🚆 TRAIN when:
  • Direct train < 2.5 hours
  • Need to work/relax
  • Carrying lots of luggage
  • Want less stress
✈️ FLY when:
  • Going to islands/northern Spain
  • Long distances
  • Time is critical
🔍 CHECK BOTH when:
  • Booking last minute on budget
  • Prices are fluctuating
  • Flexible on timing